Gaseous fuels - MESSAGE-GLOBIOM: Difference between revisions

From IAMC-Documentation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Edited automatically from page MESSAGE-GLOBIOM setup.)
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ModelDocumentationTemplate
{{ModelDocumentationTemplate
|IsEmpty=No
|IsDocumentationOf=MESSAGE-GLOBIOM
|IsDocumentationOf=MESSAGE-GLOBIOM
|DocumentationCategory=Gaseous fuels
|DocumentationCategory=Gaseous fuels
}}
}}
See <xr id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_gasfuel"/> for a list of gaseous fuel production technologies in MESSAGE.
<figtable id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_gasfuel">
{| class="wikitable"
|+<caption>Gaseous fuel production technologies in MESSAGE by energy source</caption>
! Energy Source
! Technology
|-
| rowspan="2" | Biomass
| biomass gasification
|-
| biomass gasification with CCS
|-
| rowspan="2" | Coal
| coal
|-
| coal gasification with CCS
|}
</figtable>
==Hydrogen Production==
See <xr id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_hydtech"/> for a list of hydrogen production technologies in MESSAGE.
<figtable id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_hydtech">
{| class="wikitable"
|+<caption>Hydrogen production technologies in MESSAGE by energy source</caption>
! Energy source
! Technology
! Electricity cogeneration
|-
| rowspan="2" | Gas
| steam methane reforming
| yes
|-
| steam methane reforming with CCS
| no
|-
| Electricity
| electrolysis
| no
|-
| rowspan="2" | Coal
| coal gasification
| yes
|-
| coal gasification with CCS
| yes
|-
| rowspan="2" | Biomass
| biomass gasification
| yes
|-
| biomass gasification with CCS
| yes
|}
</figtable>
As already mentioned in the section for :ref:`electricity`, technological change in MESSAGE is generally treated exogenously, although pioneering work on the endogenization of technological change in energy-engineering type models has been done with MESSAGE (Messner, 1997 [[CiteRef::MSG-GLB_messner_endogenized_1997]]). The current cost and performance parameters, including conversion efficiencies and emission coefficients is generally derived from the relevant engineering literature. For the future alternative cost and performance projections are usually developed to cover a relatively wide range of uncertainties that influences model results to a good extent. As an example, <xr id="fig:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_costind"/> below provides an overview of costs ranges for a set of key energy conversion technologies (Fricko et al., 2016 [[CiteRef::MSG-GLB_fricko_marker_2016]]).
<figure id="fig:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_costind">
[[File:costind-other.png|700px|bottom|left|thumb|<caption>Cost indicators for other conversion technology investment (Fricko et al., 2016)</caption>]] [[CiteRef::MSG-GLB_fricko_marker_2016]]
</figure>
 
In <xr id="fig:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_costind"/>, the black ranges show historical cost ranges for 2005. Green, blue, and red ranges show cost ranges in 2100 for SSP1, SSP2, and SSP3, respectively. Global values are represented by solid ranges. Values in the global South are represented by dashed ranges. The diamonds show the costs in the “North America” region. CCS – Carbon capture and storage; CTL – Coal to liquids; GTL – Gas to liquids; BTL – Biomass to liquids (Fricko et al., 2016 [[CiteRef::MSG-GLB_fricko_marker_2016]]).

Latest revision as of 17:22, 30 August 2016

Model Documentation - MESSAGE-GLOBIOM

Corresponding documentation
Previous versions
Model information
Model link
Institution International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria, http://data.ene.iiasa.ac.at.
Solution concept General equilibrium (closed economy)
Solution method Optimization
Anticipation

See <xr id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_gasfuel"/> for a list of gaseous fuel production technologies in MESSAGE.

<figtable id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_gasfuel">

Gaseous fuel production technologies in MESSAGE by energy source
Energy Source Technology
Biomass biomass gasification
biomass gasification with CCS
Coal coal
coal gasification with CCS

</figtable>

Hydrogen Production

See <xr id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_hydtech"/> for a list of hydrogen production technologies in MESSAGE.

<figtable id="tab:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_hydtech">

Hydrogen production technologies in MESSAGE by energy source
Energy source Technology Electricity cogeneration
Gas steam methane reforming yes
steam methane reforming with CCS no
Electricity electrolysis no
Coal coal gasification yes
coal gasification with CCS yes
Biomass biomass gasification yes
biomass gasification with CCS yes

</figtable>

As already mentioned in the section for :ref:`electricity`, technological change in MESSAGE is generally treated exogenously, although pioneering work on the endogenization of technological change in energy-engineering type models has been done with MESSAGE (Messner, 1997 MSG-GLB_messner_endogenized_1997). The current cost and performance parameters, including conversion efficiencies and emission coefficients is generally derived from the relevant engineering literature. For the future alternative cost and performance projections are usually developed to cover a relatively wide range of uncertainties that influences model results to a good extent. As an example, <xr id="fig:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_costind"/> below provides an overview of costs ranges for a set of key energy conversion technologies (Fricko et al., 2016 MSG-GLB_fricko_marker_2016).

<figure id="fig:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_costind">

Cost indicators for other conversion technology investment (Fricko et al., 2016)

MSG-GLB_fricko_marker_2016

</figure>

In <xr id="fig:MESSAGE-GLOBIOM_costind"/>, the black ranges show historical cost ranges for 2005. Green, blue, and red ranges show cost ranges in 2100 for SSP1, SSP2, and SSP3, respectively. Global values are represented by solid ranges. Values in the global South are represented by dashed ranges. The diamonds show the costs in the “North America” region. CCS – Carbon capture and storage; CTL – Coal to liquids; GTL – Gas to liquids; BTL – Biomass to liquids (Fricko et al., 2016 MSG-GLB_fricko_marker_2016).