GHGs - IMAGE: Difference between revisions

From IAMC-Documentation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


Concentrations of other long-lived greenhouse gases (CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, and halocarbons), and tropospheric ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) precursors (CO, NMVOC) are calculated by MAGICC in a simple atmospheric chemistry module. Halocarbons and N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations mostly show a simple mass-concentration conversion and half-life behaviour. CH<sub>4</sub> and ozone dynamics are more complex, with CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime depending on the OH concentration level, and O<sub>3</sub> and OH concentration levels depending on CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations, and NO<sub>X</sub>, CO and NMVOC emissions [[CiteRef::IMG_Meinshausen_2011b]].
Concentrations of other long-lived greenhouse gases (CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, and halocarbons), and tropospheric ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) precursors (CO, NMVOC) are calculated by MAGICC in a simple atmospheric chemistry module. Halocarbons and N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations mostly show a simple mass-concentration conversion and half-life behaviour. CH<sub>4</sub> and ozone dynamics are more complex, with CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime depending on the OH concentration level, and O<sub>3</sub> and OH concentration levels depending on CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations, and NO<sub>X</sub>, CO and NMVOC emissions [[CiteRef::IMG_Meinshausen_2011b]].
==Emissions from energy production and use==
Emission factors are used for estimating emissions from the energy-related sources, see [[Emissions_-_IMAGE|Emissions page]]. In general, the Tier 1 approach from IPCC guidelines [[CiteRef::IMG_IPCC_2006]] is used. In the energy system, emissions are calculated by multiplying energy use fluxes by time-dependent emission factors. Changes in emission factors represent, for example, technology improvements and end-of-pipe control techniques, fuel emission standards for transport, and clean-coal technologies in industry.
The emission factors for the historical period for the energy system and industrial processes are calibrated with the EDGAR emission model described by [[CiteRef::IMG_BraspenningRadu_2016]]. Calibration to the EDGAR database is not always straightforward because of differences in aggregation level. The general rule is to use weighted average emission factors for aggregation. However, where this results in incomprehensible emission factors (in particular, large differences between the emission factors for the underlying technologies), specific emission factors were chosen.
Future emission factors are based on the following rules:
::*Emission factors can follow an exogenous scenario, which can be based on the storyline of the scenario. In some cases, exogenous emission factor scenarios are used, such as the Current Legislation Scenario (CLE) developed by IIASA (for instance, Cofala et al., (2002). The CLE scenario describes the policies in different regions for the 2000–2030 period.
::*Alternatively, emission factors can be derived from generic rules, one of which in IMAGE is the EKC: Environmental Kuznets Curve (Stern, 2003; Smith et al., 2005; Van Ruijven et al., 2008; Carson, 2010; Smith et al., 2011). EKC suggests that starting from low-income levels, per-capita emissions will increase with increasing per-capita income and will peak at some point and then decline. The last is driven by increasingly stringent environmental policies, and by shifts within sectors to industries with lower emissions and improved technology. Although such shifts do not necessarily lead to lower absolute emissions, average emissions per unit of energy use decline. See below, for further discussion of EKC.
::*Combinations of the methods described above for a specific period, followed by additional rules based on income levels.
==Land-use related emissions==
CO<sub>2</sub> exchanges between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere computed by the LPJ model are described in Carbon cycle and natural vegetation. The land-use emissions model focuses on emissions of other compounds, including greenhouse gases (CH<sub>4</sub>, N2O), ozone precursors (NO<sub>X</sub>, CO, NMVOC), acidifying compounds (SO<sub>2</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>) and aerosols (SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>3</sub>, BC, OC).
For many sources, the emission factor is used (see [[Emissions_-_IMAGE|Emissions page]]). Most emission factors for anthropogenic sources are from the EDGAR database, with time-dependent values for historical years. In the scenario period, most emission factors are constant, except for explicit climate abatement policies (see below).
There are some other exceptions: Various land-use related gaseous nitrogen emissions are modelled in grid-specific models (see further), and in several other cases, emission factors depend on the assumptions described in other parts of IMAGE. For example, enteric fermentation CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from non-dairy and dairy cattle are calculated on the basis of energy requirement and feed type. High-quality feed, such as concentrates from feed crops, have a lower CH<sub>4</sub> emission factor than feed with a lower protein level and a higher content of components of lower digestibility. This implies that when feed conversion ratios change, the level of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions will automatically change. Pigs, and sheep and goats have IPCC 2006 [[CiteRef::IMG_IPCC_2006]] emission factors, which depend on the level of development of the countries. In IMAGE, agricultural productivity is used as a proxy for the development. For sheep and goats, the level of development is taken from EDGAR.


==Emission abatement==
==Emission abatement==


Emissions from energy, industry, agriculture, waste and land-use sources are also expected to vary in future years, as a result of climate policy. This is described using abatement coefficients, the values of which depend on the scenario assumptions and the stringency of climate policy described in the climate policy component. In scenarios with climate change or sustainability as the key feature in the storyline, abatement is more important than in business-as-usual scenarios. Abatement factors are used for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from fossil fuel production and transport, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from transport, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from enteric fermentation and animal waste, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from animal waste according to the IPCC method. These abatement files are calculated in the IMAGE climate policy sub-model FAIR by comparing the costs of non-CO<sub>2</sub> abatement in agriculture and other mitigation options.
Emissions from energy, industry, agriculture, waste and land-use sources are also expected to vary in future years, as a result of climate policy. This is described using abatement coefficients, the values of which depend on the scenario assumptions and the stringency of climate policy described in the climate policy component. In scenarios with climate change or sustainability as the key feature in the storyline, abatement is more important than in business-as-usual scenarios. Abatement factors are used for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from fossil fuel production and transport, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from transport, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from enteric fermentation and animal waste, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from animal waste according to the IPCC method. These abatement files are calculated in the IMAGE climate policy sub-model FAIR by comparing the costs of non-CO<sub>2</sub> abatement in agriculture and other mitigation options.

Revision as of 14:43, 12 January 2017

Model Documentation - IMAGE

Corresponding documentation
Previous versions
Model information
Model link
Institution PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Netherlands, https://www.pbl.nl/en.
Solution concept Partial equilibrium (price elastic demand)
Solution method Simulation
Anticipation Simulation modelling framework, without foresight. However, a simplified version of the energy/climate part of the model (called FAIR) can be run prior to running the framework to obtain data for climate policy simulations.

The IMAGE climate model (based on MAGICC 6.0, IMG_Meinshausen_2011a) calculates atmospheric CO2 concentration based on CO2 emission data for energy, industry and land-use change; terrestrial carbon balance; and carbon uptake by the oceans (calculated in MAGICC on the basis of the Bern Ocean Carbon model).

Concentrations of other long-lived greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O, and halocarbons), and tropospheric ozone (O3) precursors (CO, NMVOC) are calculated by MAGICC in a simple atmospheric chemistry module. Halocarbons and N2O concentrations mostly show a simple mass-concentration conversion and half-life behaviour. CH4 and ozone dynamics are more complex, with CH4 lifetime depending on the OH concentration level, and O3 and OH concentration levels depending on CH4 concentrations, and NOX, CO and NMVOC emissions IMG_Meinshausen_2011b.

Emission abatement

Emissions from energy, industry, agriculture, waste and land-use sources are also expected to vary in future years, as a result of climate policy. This is described using abatement coefficients, the values of which depend on the scenario assumptions and the stringency of climate policy described in the climate policy component. In scenarios with climate change or sustainability as the key feature in the storyline, abatement is more important than in business-as-usual scenarios. Abatement factors are used for CH4 emissions from fossil fuel production and transport, N2O emissions from transport, CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation and animal waste, and N2O emissions from animal waste according to the IPCC method. These abatement files are calculated in the IMAGE climate policy sub-model FAIR by comparing the costs of non-CO2 abatement in agriculture and other mitigation options.

Retrieved from "https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=GHGs_-_IMAGE&oldid=6681"