Electricity - REMIND-MAgPIE: Difference between revisions
Laura Delsa (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Laura Delsa (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|DocumentationCategory=Electricity | |DocumentationCategory=Electricity | ||
}} | }} | ||
Around twenty electricity generation technologies are represented in REMIND, see | Around twenty electricity generation technologies are represented in REMIND, see <xr id="tab:REMIND_electricity_technologies"/>, with several low-carbon (CCS) and zero carbon options (nuclear and renewables). | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
'''Table | '''Table 2'''. Techno-economic characteristics of technologies based on exhaustible energy sources and biomass (Iwasaki 2003; Hamelinck 2004; Bauer 2005; Ansolabehere et al. 2007; Gül et al. 2007; Ragettli 2007; Schulz 2007; Uddin and Barreto 2007; Rubin et al. 2007; Takeshita and Yamaji 2008; Brown et al. 2009; Klimantos et al. 2009; Chen and Rubin 2009). | ||
<figure id="fig:REMINDtable_5"> | <figure id="fig:REMINDtable_5"> | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
For variable renewable energies, we implemented two parameterized cost markup functions for storage and long-distance transmission grids - see Section Grid and Infrastructure. To represent the general need for flexibility even in a thermal power system, we included a further flexibility constraint based on Sullivan et al. (2013). | For variable renewable energies, we implemented two parameterized cost markup functions for storage and long-distance transmission grids - see Section Grid and Infrastructure. To represent the general need for flexibility even in a thermal power system, we included a further flexibility constraint based on Sullivan et al. (2013). | ||
The techno-economic parameters of power technologies used in the model are given in | The techno-economic parameters of power technologies used in the model are given in <xr id="fig:REMINDtable_5"/> for fuel-based technologies and <xr id="fig:REMINDtable_6"/> for non-biomass renewables. For wind, solar and hydro, capacity factors depend on grades, see Section Non-biomass renewables. | ||
'''Table | '''Table 3'''. Techno-economic characteristics of technologies based on non-biomass renewable energy sources (Neij et al. 2003; Nitsch et al. 2004; IEA 2007a; Junginger et al. 2008; Pietzcker et al. 2014). | ||
<figure id="fig:REMINDtable_6"> | <figure id="fig:REMINDtable_6"> | ||
[[File:Remind Table 6.PNG]] | [[File:Remind Table 6.PNG]] | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Revision as of 15:30, 1 February 2017
| Corresponding documentation | |
|---|---|
| Previous versions | |
| Model information | |
| Model link | |
| Institution | Potsdam Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK), Germany, https://www.pik-potsdam.de. |
| Solution concept | General equilibrium (closed economy)MAgPIE: partial equilibrium model of the agricultural sector; |
| Solution method | OptimizationMAgPIE: cost minimization; |
| Anticipation | |
Around twenty electricity generation technologies are represented in REMIND, see <xr id="tab:REMIND_electricity_technologies"/>, with several low-carbon (CCS) and zero carbon options (nuclear and renewables).
Table 4. Energy Conversion Technologies for Electricity (Note: † indicates that technologies can be combined with CCS). <figtable id="tab:REMIND_electricity_technologies">
| Energy Carrier | Technology |
|---|---|
| Primary exhaustible resource | |
| Coal |
|
| Oil |
|
| Gas |
|
| Uranium |
|
| Primary renewable resource | |
| Solar |
|
| Wind |
|
| Hydropower |
|
| Biomass |
|
| Geothermal |
|
| Secondary energy type | |
| Hydrogen |
|
</figtable>
<figure id="fig:REMINDtable_4">
</figure>
Table 2. Techno-economic characteristics of technologies based on exhaustible energy sources and biomass (Iwasaki 2003; Hamelinck 2004; Bauer 2005; Ansolabehere et al. 2007; Gül et al. 2007; Ragettli 2007; Schulz 2007; Uddin and Barreto 2007; Rubin et al. 2007; Takeshita and Yamaji 2008; Brown et al. 2009; Klimantos et al. 2009; Chen and Rubin 2009).
<figure id="fig:REMINDtable_5">
</figure>
Abbreviations: PC - pulverized coal, IGCC - integrated coal gasification combined cycle, CHP - coal combined heat and power plant, C2H2 - coal to hydrogen, C2L - coal to liquids, C2G - coal gasification, NGT - natural gas turbine, NGCC - natural gas combined cycle, SMR - steam methane reforming, BIGCC – Biomass IGCC, BioCHP – biomass combined heat and power, B2H2 – biomass to hydrogen, B2L – biomass to liquids, B2G – biogas, TNR - thermo-nuclear reactor; * for joint production processes; § nuclear reactors with thermal efficiency of 33%; # technologies with exogenously improving efficiencies. 2005 values are represented by the lower end of the range. Long-term efficiencies (reached after 2045) are represented by high-end ranges.
For variable renewable energies, we implemented two parameterized cost markup functions for storage and long-distance transmission grids - see Section Grid and Infrastructure. To represent the general need for flexibility even in a thermal power system, we included a further flexibility constraint based on Sullivan et al. (2013).
The techno-economic parameters of power technologies used in the model are given in <xr id="fig:REMINDtable_5"/> for fuel-based technologies and <xr id="fig:REMINDtable_6"/> for non-biomass renewables. For wind, solar and hydro, capacity factors depend on grades, see Section Non-biomass renewables.
Table 3. Techno-economic characteristics of technologies based on non-biomass renewable energy sources (Neij et al. 2003; Nitsch et al. 2004; IEA 2007a; Junginger et al. 2008; Pietzcker et al. 2014).
<figure id="fig:REMINDtable_6">
</figure>